It's interesting that the concept of free speech is always invoked when discussing platforms like Twitter and Facebook, but the Courts fail to see how social media is the new public forum.
Reminder that Smallpox is only the
#22
most dangerous disease in USA, just behind
#21
which is Reye Syndrome. Itโs not even a dangerous disease so you donโt need to give them support like their lives are in danger.
I appreciate the sentiment but this is a bad take.
This is the most ridiculous poll result I have ever seen. Invoking a constitutional right is definitely not an indication of guilt. My first instinct is to blame this on the commercialization of justice and the American legal system. ๐คทโโ๏ธ
I will be making a video investigating one of the most thought provoking UFO events in modern history on my second channel very soon. Iโm the initial phases of research now. Hope to see you there when the video is released!
Hey
@TeamYouTube
I seem to be having the very same video distribution issue that
@PirateSoftware
was having. My videos are not being pushed outside of my subscriber base. My monthly subscribers has dropped nearly 70% since October. This is not sustainable. Please help.
Recently a channel that only posts body cam footage tried to copyright strike
@DaleHillerYT
for using footage that is available in the public domain. Not only is this a blatant abuse of YouTubeโs copyright system, but itโs also contrary to free speech and the Constitution.
The United States military should not have the unfettered authority to dictate what information about potential UPAs is disseminated to the public. Who here trusts the military industrial complex to handle this with our best interest in mind?
Hey
@IJ
I would love to collaborate with you regarding Stephen Lara's case. My channel can bring a lot of attention to this case and civil asset forfeiture in general. Please DM or email me!
Many people have asked for me to review this interaction, but there is not enough contextual information available to cover it at this time. When more footage is released I will take another look at it.
We do not pay police officers to play boogeyman for children who misbehave at school. This is not โstandard operating procedureโ and this behavior only serves to erode the departmentโs public image and relationship with the community.
Newly disclosed video from 2018 shows a police officer in Key West, Florida, putting handcuffs on a sobbing 8-year-old boy in a school corridor. โStandard operating proceduresโ were followed, the cityโs police chief said.
More at
@MiamiHerald
.
Many people have asked me to review this video, but I cannot draw any conclusions without knowing what happened before the video begins. I realize there are rumors and speculation, but I need fact before I can cover this.
This incident extends beyond the failures of these officers to build a positive and influential relationship with the child, but also highlights the deplorable condition of Americaโs mental health system. Particularly when dealing with children.
#MentalHealthMatters
#deescalate
1/ Hey
@RealMattOrchard
While I enjoyed your piece on vigilante pedo catchers, I also noticed that you neglected to consider the full scope of NJ's criminal coercion statute. (Referencing NJ Rev Stat ยง 2C:13-5)
@TeamYouTube
Iโve been doing this for many years. I understand YouTubeโs search and discovery system. What I am saying is that my analytics have dramatically changed without any change in content. Something is clearly wrong with how my content is being distributed. Happy to share in DMs.
@TeamYouTube
Then I believe several of my videos were inaccurately reviewed. I am a credentialed journalist reporting and educating about the justice system. This seems to be the very definition of the content that YouTube mentioned in that statement.
"The line separating good and evil passes through every human heart. And even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained. And even in the best of all hearts, there remains a small corner of evil." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
@Meetman69
@TeamYouTube
Honestly, even I am a bit taken aback by this response. If this is what YouTube considers creator support then I fear for the future of my channel. Enjoy it while you can.
Hey
@that_chapter
as a fellow YouTuber at close to the same sub level and a fan of your content Iโd love to speak with you about a couple of things. This is not an attempt to collab or solicit anything. I have a few questions I think you could help with. No more, no less. Cheers!
@TeamYouTube
Over the last few months my entire back catalog has been pushed out of the algorithm and our overall revenue and viewership has been reduced by nearly 60%, placing my entire team's jobs in jeporady. This was too dramatic to be explained by audience trends. Help us!
Thanks for joining us on Twitter! We will be posting regular updates and exclusive content right here! Follow us and learn more about the law and police interactions.
@RonDuncan7
Im certainly not a fan of more government either, but I am a fan of the โchecks and balanceโ concept that is supposed to exist within this country. Maybe that should extend to this particular situation.
5/ 6/ It should be noted that I wasnโt able to find any NJ cases that defined the code in the specific context highlighted in your video, but I still find the defense relevant to mention when making accusations about potential criminal conduct.
4/ I am not trying to defend the actions of the individuals you show in your video, but there is a legitimate argument to be made that this code was not implicated. Do what you will with this information, but I would caution you to consider this before making further accusations
@FinneyLawFirm
@YouTube
Thanks for sharing! Appreciate the work you all are doing. Feel free to share more cases with me if youโd like to get the story out there!
3/ It states: โIt is an affirmative defense to prosecution that the actor believed the accusation or secret to be true or the proposed official action justified and that his purpose was limited to compelling the other to behave in a way reasonably related to the circumstances...
@tertiushand
Yes. Very similar to a mall parking lot, which has been declared a public forum under certain circumstances. Donโt buy into the corporate propaganda. There is a legitimate argument to be made that social media companies should adhere to the tenets of the First Amendment .
2/ You quoted the statute accurately in your video, but you left out the affirmative defenses to the code that is listed directly below the subsections. This is important because it directly relates to the intent of the coercion.
@aintnowaybruhs
The point is that statistics like this are relative. Itโs pretty fair to say that any job that cracks the top 100 is a dangerous job. These statistics ignore the practical dangers associated with any job. Quantifying police work in the context of other jobs is wrong.
@Its_Lynnocent
Thanks for watching! Donโt forget that there are good police in America. It is easy to lose sight of that if you do not diversify the content you consume. Cheers!
@ronrule
@ColeTrainRey
@Bill_E_Batts
@benheckman_
Ron is right fellas. 18 ยง 3503 of the Penn. Gen. Assembly confirms it. If you knowingly enter without permission it is considered criminal trespass. Not the same in all states, so be aware of that. I am assuming this was in Penn. because of the OPs profile location.
@kcincina
@jamesmykil
@New_Common_Law
@hartgoat
Agreed. Seems like the officer didn't do anything wrong here. Citizens do not have a constitutional right to speak to a supervisor. (Hard to say anything for sure without more context.)
@TeamYouTube
This is not due to audience trends. Please actually investigate the issue before offering suggestions. All of our analytics are at an all time high except viewership.
3/...which were the subject of the accusation exposure or proposed official action, as by desisting from further misbehavior, making good a wrong done, or refraining from taking any action or responsibility for which the actor believes the other disqualified.โ
@EricFawcett24
Looks can be deceiving, and it is imperative to draw you conclusions based on facts, not assumptions. There is no educational value in assuming what happened before the video begins.
5/ It should be noted that I wasnโt able to find any NJ cases that defined the code in the specific context highlighted in your video, but I still find the defense relevant to mention when making accusations about potential criminal conduct.
@RealMattOrchard
I agree with that. And I agree that there is a balance of information to entertainment to consider. But I also maintain that making criminal accusations without conveying the full context of the law is somewhat deceiving. Just an opinion though. Loved the video! Cheers!
@Lupin8492
Sure thing. Iโll add it to the description now. That was one of my favorite episodes because his story highlights the flaws of both the policing and mental health systems of our country. I wish more people watched that episode.
@mathurinK3
@Magic_City_1984
@Foxsobb
@Mrgunsngear
I actually donโt beg to differ, and I find it troubling that you have come to this conclusion after watching my channel. Not all police officers are bad. End of story.
@TeamYouTube
It would be nice if someone could just take a look at my channel and make sure that everything appears correct. I donโt understand the point of even having analytics when it is impossible to draw any reliable information from it. All my numbers point to algorithm issues.
@mateogarciajax
If the auditor did film the inside of the nursing home through the window then that is a violation of the occupants reasonable expectation of privacy, and would likely not be protected under the First Amendment in a courtroom. Hope this helped!
@jajacobson55
@ronrule
@ColeTrainRey
@Bill_E_Batts
@benheckman_
I agree. I was mostly speaking on whether or not verbal warnings were warranted as a whole, not in this instance in particular. The fact that he was in a public place is certainly a factor. Doubt criminal trespass would apply. Defiant Trespassing stat could if he didn't leave.
@AshleyTrube
Indians Code 34-28-5-3.5 says that you must identify if you are stopped for an infraction or ordinance violation. So it would makes sense that the officer would need RAS of a violation in order to demand ID.
@GameaholicMedia
@jdn4mbvbrw
@Meetman69
@TeamYouTube
Dude you have no clue whatโs going on. My viewers are returning. My subscribers now make up the majority of my views. But if you were successful on any social media platform you would know that this isnโt how the industry works.
@n00b54u5e
@cpt_crazy91
@BadLegalTakes
Youโre completely ignoring the several decades of interpretation associated with the Fifth Amendment. You should do some homework before you draw any conclusions. Your take is misguided
@n00b54u5e
@LJcaptC
1/ It would certainly depend on where the scene was located. I donโt see this being challenged in court. It would be unwise to challenge this law on the basis of 1A protections because that would likely result in the 1A becoming more restricted.
@RealMattOrchard
Sure, that's entirely a possibility. My criticism is not so much directed at your interpretation, but more so the fact that you didn't mention this as a possible defense and allow your audience to consider the implications associated with it. It is open to interpretation.
@Hgree56
Thanks for the question. Unfortunately, thatโs too circumstantial for me to give you a legitimate opinion on what to do next. If you believe that you are a victim of police misconduct then you should consult with an attorney asap.
@tertiushand
That's my argument. If your business model is built around the public voicing their opinion then it should be considered a public thoroughfare and subject to free speech protections. Robbing people of an equalized platform because you disagree them with is anti free speech.
@JohnacKelley
I can't comment with certainty, but it looks like there were mistakes on both sides. Pulling away from an officer in an aggressive manner is never a good idea, but aggressively grabbing someone for refusing to stop isn't a good look either. Can't say more atm. Thanks!
@InFamouZEg0
Thanks for your support. Unfortunately, I have covered so many cases at this point that you would probably have a better chance of remembering the ones specifically from Penn than I would. Cheers!