@ronin19217435
That's a rocket launch.
An "artificial sun" is just a nuclear reactor that relies on nuclear fusion, rather than fission, to produce energy. China is not the only country researching this tech either.
🧵Closest populations to ancient Andalusians according to FST genetic distances🧵
Umayyad period Andalus (This sample is E-M81 btw)
1 - 🇾🇪
2 - 🇹🇳🇱🇾
3 - 🇲🇦
4 - 🇵🇸
5 - 🇩🇿
6 - 🇸🇦
7 - 🇷🇺
8 - 🇪🇸
9 - 🌍
10 - 🌏
Fst values are high due to this sample being pseudohaploid.
🧵 The origin of E-M81 🧵
Many Berberists claims that E-M81 is "Amazigh" and indigenous to North Africa. However E-M81 has NEVER been found in Mesolithic, Neolithic, Bronze Age, Iron Age, Lybico-Berber, and Roman period North Africa.
The absence of E-M81 among Phoenician remains from Spain & Italy combined with its dominance among the Arab remains from the same countries pretty much destroyed my theory that E-M81 was spread by Phoenicians.
I was wrong 😒
I must've really made Berberists angry by exposing their R-V88 brother today because they are swarming my tweets so let's remind them that there's
0 E-M81 in Mesolithic North Africa
0 E-M81 in Neolithic North Africa
0 E-M81 in Copper Age North Africa
Real Africans (haplogroup A & B)
vs
Cosplay "Africans" (haplogroup E-M81)
From: The Consistencies of Y-Chromosomal and Autosomal Continental Ancestry Varying among Haplogroups - Wang et al. 2016
Friendly reminder that the Guanches were white skinned invaders and also had Middle Eastern ancestry best represented by Bedouin_B.
They were not indigenous to Africa, they were just another group of Semitic migrants in Africa.
I've seen some people claiming that the oldest Guanche sample (CAN.010) is E-M81. This is false and here is why:
1⃣This sample extremely low-coverage, its overall coverage is 1.4% and the coverage of its Y-DNA is 0.55%, so it is far too low to properly predict its Y-DNA
Berber: "Hi saar, my haplogroup is G2, did you know that I am not not akshually Berber btw. I am Andalusian, the actual Berbers are these E-M81 guys, they are the true natives of North Africa, as for us G2 guys, we just mixed with their women."
According to Almarri et al. 2021, Natufians are best modeled as 100% Levant_HG and Levant_HG are best modeled as 44% Basal_Eurasian and 56% Main_Eurasian 🧐
Funily enough, the half SSA Muslim sample (SGBN2) is E-L19 while the most European shifted Muslim sample (SGBN1) is E-M81.
Also, the only North African shifted Muslim sample (SGBN7) is T.
PS: The mtDNA of SGBN2 is L3e5, his SSA ancestry comes from his female side.
I wrote my previous posts to point out that we have no E-M81 samples from North Africa that has been carbon dated to the pre-Islamic period since CAN.010 isn't E-M81 as I explained and R10770 is contaminated (picrel).
@Peter_Nimitz
Guanche is extinct and the few inscriptions we have from this language are undeciphered, there’s no hard evidence that supports its attribution to Berber. As for Zenaga, it has plenty of Punic loanwords, for example:
YTREE v. 12.02 Update.
-The TMRCA of E-M81 has been lowered to 2100 BC
-The two root E-M81 samples are still on E-M81* rather than on E-Y596059
-The two remaining samples that were on E-Z5009* have been reclassified as undefined E-Z5009
-There's a Syrian sample on E-CTS12227*
Compilation of all known Semitic samples. These samples are divided according to their language/ethnicity, their ancestors are noted in parenthesis.
Very high incidence of E-M81 among the sons of Abraham. Extremely high incidence of J among the sons of Ham.
It will never cease to be funny that Hitler was a Semite larping as a Pajeet while Jews are Pajeets larping as Semites.
This is a textbook example of divine irony.
@77himalaya
@Bathero235
Are you stupid? EL19 is north african and older than EM81 which is amazigh. EM165 is not atab or levantinean. The German is also EM165. Moron. EM81 is amazigh. Berbers conquered the middle east, normal. There is also guanches in EM165 and EM107. Syrian and Iraqi are basal M81
"Moreover, we learned that this haplogroup was more recent than was previously thought, which suggest that previous hypothesis should be reviewed and that, this E-M183, thought to be autochthonous of North Africa, appeared in the Near East" 🤔
Someone said in my DMs that Berbers would be the closest to the E-M81 Umayyad sample if they were included.
I included all Berber pops (and many other pops) in the AADR this time and as you can see Yemeni.HO is still closest to this sample.
"In the outgroup-F3 -statistic, comparing the group from the Muslim cemetery to the modern populations as indicated in the PCA, we observe a genetic affinity towards modern South/South-Eastern Mediterranean populations but not North African populations."
This 🇬🇪 claims that hg J is not 🇬🇪 but rather that J1 is "Arab" and J2 is "Greek", moreover he claims that E1b1b is "Berber"
He also claims that his 🇬🇪 grandfather is E-M81 despite the fact that no commercial nor professional samples from this region belongs to E-M81 😂
The new E-M165 sample supposedly belongs to a man with the lastname Horchberg according to
@Viciousintelli1
. This surname is Jewish so we now have:
-1 Levantine man on E-M165
-1 Levantine-descended man on E-M165
-0 Berber on E-M165
A R-V88 carrying Berber who spent several months larping as E-M81 lost it after I called his real haplogroup "African" and reminded him that Natufians carried E rather than R1b. You can watch him seethe here 👇
@jmrphy
Logan Alexander Paul[12] was born in Westlake, Ohio, on April 1, 1995,[13] to Pamela Stepnick and Gregory Paul. He has English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, ✡️Jewish ✡️, French and German ancestry.[14][15]
The oldest lineage inside E-M81 belongs to HGDP00620 from Israel 🇮🇱. Contrary to what some have claimed,the Middle Eastern-specific branch E-M165 is actually 1500 years older than other branch of E-M81.
So a bunch of geneticists cherrypicked three ancient Berber remains, one was contaminated, but the remaining two turned out to be autosomally European and paternally Anatolian.
IMHO this is a lot more extreme than Mussauer et al. but it went totally unnoticed.
E-M81 = E1b1b1b1a (ISOGG 2013)
"In addition, haplogroup E1b1b1b1a, accounting for 12% of all haplogroup E individuals, could be reasonably assigned to Middle East with a consistency value of 0.87."
@grounded_in
@egyptgodra
@paulbullen
@Merkallaa
@TrapEffxcts
@Joe__Bassey
The genes were African which is why their genetic matches are still among Black indigenous Africans. E-M81 is at its highest rates in Mali, Burkina Fasso, and Niger. If the so-called Berber yDNA Haplogroup were truly that of whiter people; its highest rates would be non-African.
Turn out the 23andme leak of German customers contains 0 German on E-M165.
The only "German" on E-M165 in this spreadsheet is an American by the name of Warfel. The country with the highest density of people called Warfel after the USA is.... Israel.
AHAHAHAHAHA🤣
The only E-M81 sample that could be from the pre-Islamic period is gun012, this sample however is carbon dated to 621 ± 39 (582-660 CE) so it unclear whether it is pre-Islamic or Islamic.
@travis_madox
HOLY COPE. Your own study defines low-coverage samples as samples that have a coverage depth below 0.1 which is exactly what CAN.10 (0.01x), CAN.43 (0.04x) and CAN.41 (0.01x) are according to this study. They are low coverage, I was right and you were right, simple as.
The fact that E-M81 has never been found in pre-Islamic Iberia and NA, but is dominant in Al Andalus and in Islamic-period NA (Canary Islands) makes it far more likely that this sample dates to the Islamic period.
BONUS:
"E3b2 [E-M81] itself shows a significant correlogram in a SAAP analysis... These findings, together with the gene diversity pattern described above, are consistent with the hypothesis of a demic expansion from the Middle East."
Arredi et al. 2004
I'm so fucking tired of these (((edomite))) reasearchers and their euro shabbos goyim. First they hide all the E-M81 samples found among Punics and now they pretend that the oldest E-M81 carrier is BA snownigger.
Filthy khazar sub-humans.
The new mummy that supposedly carry E-M35 (2509) actually has 200+ reads for R1b and only 28 reads for E, it is also negative for 3 out 4 SNPs of E-M35.
These guys are so desperate to link us with Africa somehow that they are just making up stuff at this point.
Which bring us to the true origin of this haplogroup. E-M81 is descended from the Natufian haplogroup E-M35, its most basal subclades are carried respectively by an Israeli Bedouin and a Jew (a real one, not a fake one) from the tribe of Levi.
@travis_madox
BTW
Two of the Guanche samples that are defined as E-M81*/E-M183* in your meme study are on YFULL and they are WAY downstream of the Iraqi.
Some might try to argue in favor of the Caucasian haplogroup J but this haplogroup is not even Semitic and has actually been found among the Canaanites, the racial enemies of the Israelites so there's 0 chance for this haplogroup to be Israelite.
🚨
The TMRCA of E-M165 was raised from 2400 ybp to 3300 ybp due to the addition of the Bedouin line.
It is now clear that the the line of the Arab branch (4260 ybp) of E-M165 is WAY older than the European/Jewish (2381 ybp) branch.
2⃣It only has 1 out of 100+ SNPs of E-M81, namely PF2487, and it is not the defining SNP of M81 (PF2554) so this sample is quite literally not E-M81.
3⃣This sample is also positive for 1 out 14 SNPs of E-Y138115, so it is more likely E-Y138115 than E-M81.
Some people claim that the R1b Egyptian samples from Wurst et al. 2024 were contaminated by an Italian researcher. However this is disproven by the fact that none of them looks remotely Italian auDNA-wise instead they appear to be a mixture of SSA and various Eurasian groups.
Within the Christian cemetery, primarily European-associated haplotypes are observed: branch R1b-M269 [55] (4 of 9 individuals) and typical Balkan/Eastern Mediterranean haplogroups such as E1b-V13 [56], J2a-M410 [57] and E1b-M78.
@77himalaya
@Khopesh_Wielder
What African females are those ? They mostly carry U6a which is definitely not a Sub-Saharan maternal haplogroup, if anything your argument should be that they were a mix of African males with Near Eastern females.
@Viciousintelli1
Hochberg
Name
MeaningJewish (Ashkenazic): artificial name from German hoch 'high' + Berg 'mountain, hill'.
This clearly shows that E-M81 is Levantine.
@Tasdghj1
Nope. It originated in 🇮🇱. As for IAM, he was a Levantine migrant and carried a different haplogroup from Berbers/Iberomaurusians.
Btw the oldest remains of your haplogroups are found in 🇷🇺 and🇬🇪😉
@travis_madox
Seething lol. Your own study admits that they use low coverage samples.
Anyway, we already know that E-M81* isn't carried by Berbers, you belong to younger clades downstream of the one carried by the Iraqi... if you are even E-M81 that is.
@Ghirdayaz
E-L19 is indeed the ancestor of E-M81.
However E-M81 formed in 13,000 ybp while these individuals lived in 7000 ybp so they aren't the ancestors of modern E-M81 carriers. Furthermore they were Levantine migrants which clearly establish that E-L19 was present in the Levant.
In conclusion, we don't have any actual Israelite samples right now.
PS: We have quite a few Proto-Semitic samples (Natufians) tho, so we know that the Israelites belonged exclusively to haplogroup E like their Natufian forefathers.
- with green and manganese epigraphy (al-mulk) and fragments of kitchen ceramics.
We analyzed one individual from this site:
I7500/Individuo 2: 900–1100 CE
Haplogroup: E-M81 > E-Z1200👑
For the five individuals buried in the Muslim cemetery which have sufficient data for inferring the Y-chromosome haplotypes, we observe haplogroups associated with North Africa (E1b-M81 and E1b-M310.1) [53,54], the Eastern Mediterranean (J2b-M241) and Western Eurasia (T1a-M70).
The idea that the Guanches were Berbers (picrel) has also been disproven by genetics since they had white to brown skin unlike Ethnic Berbers such as Shilhas, Touaregs, Gouraras, Zanagas and Siwas who are Black.
The "indigenous" population of North Africa carried a different haplogroup, namely E-M78. Furthermore they were a mixed race population of Levantine invaders (63.5%) and indigenous Black Africans (36.5%).
Some Berberists claim that E-M81 was carried by a Numidian, but the "Numidian" in question was actually a Roman colonist from Sitifis in Mauretania (not Numidia). Furthermore this sample is contaminated, meaning it contains modern DNA rather than ancient DNA.
E-M81 was also absent from Bronze Age North Africans who carried exclusively E-M78. As for Iron Age North Africans, they belonged to haplogroup R1b and J2.