This interview with the Senior Rabbi of our local synagogue in the Hudson Valley village of Croton-on-Hudson about Oct 7, Gaza, Israel, Hamas, etc. might be of wider interest.
@abbydphillip
When I signed the lease for our apartment, I never promised the landlord I was going to literally pay the rent. What I meant was that an improving economy and boom in the housing market would increase the value of the building and so he would get the rent that way.
I’ve been a science journalist for 40+ years. One of the biggest disappointments has been to learn that scientists are often some of the most unscientific people around.
@moorehn
Some day we will live in a society where refusing to accept genocide and war crimes will be a personal brand everyone can be proud of. But the whole idea is to try to crush everyone’s spirits and make them grovel before power. Students showing the way.
1/ This interview with Fauci is fascinating in a number of ways. First, he admits the lab leak hypothesis is possible if not plausible, which should—given the long and widespread idolization of Fauci by so many scientists and science journalists—put the kabosh on the…
So the mystery of Covid-19 origins can be boiled down to one question: Who put the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2, Mother Nature or a research team? Mother Nature is so far silent on the topic, but at least we know in writing what the researchers were hoping to do.
1/ This pandemic is the worst disaster to befall humanity since WWII. Forget about 9/11, forget about earthquakes and floods. We probably have 20 million dead. Anyone who ridicules or uses their power to try to suppress the sincere efforts of some to figure out…
When Fauci said his NIAID did not fund Gain of Function research at the Wuhan Inst Virology he was dead wrong (that’s where much of the research Daszak refers to was done.) Whether he lied about it is another question, but one really can’t blame some for thinking he did.
I’ve now read this
@NewYorker
piece by Emma Green, focusing on the People’s C.D.C. It really is as bad as many are saying, and surprising for the NYer for a number of reasons. The bias towards mainstream institutions is manifest (calling the group a “ragtag coalition”…
A while ago, someone I know started sending around links to the People's CDC—a coalition that styles itself as a model of what the CDC would look like if it actually **followed the science** on pandemic restrictions. I was fascinated. (1/x)
Some preliminary comments from me, as a science journalist. First: This is serious business. These authors are claiming to have found fingerprints left in SARS-CoV-2 left by stitching together the parts that allegedly went to making it. If true...
Pre-print:
Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2
A collaborative product by
@VBruttel
,
@tony_vandongen
, and myself.
Here's what we found:
1/
#MeToo
alert: Paleontologist Leonardo Avilla of the Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro. Numerous reports of severe sexual
#harassment
,
#bullying
, attempts to morally degrade students.
#paleontology
DMs with full confidentiality.
I've said before that some scientists are among the most unscientific people I've known. That's partly because argument from authority is much more embedded in the intellectual life and discourse of scientists than they realize. Just as doctors are led to think...
@Ocasio2018
@JDPCogginbooks
True. Most European countries legally mandate at last a month of vacation. In France it’s 5 weeks. It’s called being humane.
Last year
#Fauci
told Rand Paul angrily, “The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” But WIV has now lost its NIH funding because it refuses to report what research it did do. So how does Fauci know?
I've held off saying too much about this interview in
@guardian
with virologist Angela Rasmussen by
@lfspinney
, because I have great overall respect for Laura as a science journalist and she has been a good friend for a number of years.
This new evidence just released by the House committee on Covid origins is damning. It shows that nearly everyone involved in the pivotal Proximal Origins paper has been dishonest about how it came about and the involvement of
#Fauci
and Farrar.
Yesterday I did a lengthy thread about a new study, using restriction enzyme analysis of SARS-CoV-2, which concludes that there is a very high probability the pandemic virus was created in a lab:
Some preliminary comments from me, as a science journalist. First: This is serious business. These authors are claiming to have found fingerprints left in SARS-CoV-2 left by stitching together the parts that allegedly went to making it. If true...
@kathygriffin
Kathy, let me take this opportunity to say that your joke with Trump’s severed head was in the best of taste compared to the racism and
#xenophobia
that he peddles every day. The severed head was not real, the
#racism
is.
Your reminder that Anthony
#Fauci
knew full well that gain-of-function work was being done in Wuhan. Some projects involved collaborations between Wuhan University and the NIH-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology.
#COVID19
For those who are into parsimony,
@WashburneAlex
demonstrates that the lab origins hypothesis is overwhelmingly the most parsimonious explanation for emergence of Covid-19. A truly brilliant laying out of the evidence and how it fits together.
@WakeRevolt
@moorehn
Gaza is very similar to the Jewish ghetto in Warsaw during the early 1940s and is based on the same concepts of racial superiority.
4/ to the viruses that U.S. taxpayers did pay for. Of course, since the Wuhan lab will not tell NIH what it did with their money—for which it got its funding cut—how could Fauci know what he did and did not pay for? Of course he could not know. One is forced to imagine…
@kenvogel
@maggieNYT
@Yankees
@katierogers
@noahweiland
Okay, I really need to make sure I got this right. Trump invited himself to throw out the first pitch, then turned down his own invitation, then invited himself to do it later in the season. Watch this space.
Critic of congressional probe [of Covid origins] helped fund Wuhan gain-of-function study - [
@PeterHotez
has been loudly opposing a Congressional investigation of Covid origins these past months. Conflict of interest?]
@emilyakopp
The failure of ANY mainstream
#media
outlet to report that
@NIH
has cut funding to the Wuhan Inst of Virology for refusal to report what it did with U.S. taxpayer money now has to be considered a deliberate editorial decision not to cover relevant news.
#journalism
BREAKING NEWS: LEAKED DOCUMENT SHOWS U.S. AND CHINESE SCIENTISTS PLANNED TO GENETICALLY ENGINEER A SARS-LIKE VIRUS BY INSERTING A SEGMENT KNOWN TO MAKE IT MORE INFECTIOUS TO HUMANS
The scientists who are most vigorously opposing the lab leak hypothesis have the most invested interests in it not being true. For that reason, they cannot be relied upon as the sole subject matter experts, as much as they continue to insist that they should be.
Announcing my new hypothesis for the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 based on the new study presented in Singapore (see Nature for details) finding that the common ancestor of the pandemic virus evolved very recently. 1/ Bats from Vientiane Province, Laos, came into contact with…
Bullshit. The Los Angeles school shootings were not an "accident." There are responsible adults who made it possible for the girl to get hold of a handgun.
#guns
#NRA
2/ claim that it’s just a crazy “conspiracy theory.” It could be true, Fauci tells us. . 3/ But Fauci goes on to say that if it is true, he/NIAID/NIH did not pay for the pandemic virus to be created. That’s because it is not genetically related…4/
6/ Had their own test tubes with their names on them. Facetiousness aside, the point is that the lab origins hypothesis, as Fauci now agrees, has always been a possible and even reasonable idea, and the real challenge is to search out the truth—which, sad to say, some…
So now we find out from Slack messages they never meant us to see that the Proximal Boys thought lab leak was very likely all along but couldn’t prove it and anyway it would make China mad so they just wrote it was a natural origin. Really. Right there in black and white.
I had an interesting exchange with
@MichaelWorobey
today about the Covid-19 origins debate, in which he suggested that having a beer and talking might help to cool down passions which are clearly running high. I told him I would welcome having that beer and that…
I’ve been a science journalist for decades. This piece on the new Nature paper by Ben Mueller of
@nytimes
is such an amazing mix of laziness, incompetence, and bias that any one of the 100+ journalism students I have taught could do better.
Want to make sure folks are seeing these emails from Kristian Andersen, first author of Proximal Origin paper. At the time of submission to
@nature
, KA made clear a lab origin could not be dismissed, was not a "conspiracy theory," but they had badly wanted to prove that.
1/ During my decades as a science journalist, I have talked with hundreds of researchers about the “peer review” process and how it really works. It’s not pretty, kind of like looking at a sausage factory and seeing how sausage is really made…
In making your decision about whether or not to leave
#Twitter
, please think about people around the world living under authoritarian and brutal governments who need social media to be able to tell others what they are experiencing and to ask for help. How many…
coming from any of the major discussants in the Covid origins debate, who are fellow scientists and science journalists. On the other hand, Rasmussen herself has been the single most toxic presence in this debate, as illustrated by this early Tweet (see screenshot.)
@JamesCTobias
Reading over these docs again, it becomes crystal clear that the Proximal Origins authors took a public stand against the lab origins hypothesis before they had spent any serious time or effort analyzing the possibilities. In that sense the paper was pure propaganda.
There is no “anti-science” attitude more insidious than the idea that the truth is represented by what the “majority” of scientists think at any given moment. Almost as bad: Stating that “most scientists” agree on something without any evidence that they do.
5/ A row of test tubes in Shi Zhengli’s lab, one marked “NIH viruses,” another perhaps marked “Chinese Academy of Sciences viruses,” and a third maybe “Shi’s personal viruses.” (We also have to assume that there were grad students and post docs in the institute who…
That Rasmussen can not only get away with such a demeaning personal attack, but is actually cheered on by some other scientists and journalists, and even gets an interview in
@guardian
where she is allowed to play victim despite her victimizing behavior, is really rich.
@aprilaser
I suggested earlier today that SPJ (
@spj_tweets
) add properly crediting prior reporting as part of its Code of Ethics. Because this is an ethical question, not just a matter of professional courtesy, although it’s that too.
#media
#journalism
Before Covid-19, I never would have even considered the possibility that anything other than the conventional explanations for the origins of HIV were worth considering. Now I think all hypotheses have to be at least considered. The breach of trust has been momentous.
Michael Worobey dismissed the statistical link between early HIV infections and locations where the oral polio vaccine was trialed in the Congo in the 1950's based on chimp faeces he sampled 40 years later not showing a connection. In 2022, he claimed early lineage B cases linked
A peer-reviewed paper that concludes there is no evidence for zoonotic spillover at the Huanan Seafood Market in
#Wuhan
has just been published
@Nature
. How will the
#media
, especially science journalists, deal with it? This is a test.
#journalism
The Economist now wants to downplay this story by
@natashaloder
as much as possible without actually retracting it. It also miseducates the public about the nature of science, implying that the best papers are by “known” scientists and “unknown” ones can be ignored.
Three unknown scientists claim SARS-CoV-2 has some genetic features that they say would appear if the virus had been stitched together by some form of engineering. It is unclear yet whether this is accurate
It’s important to note that nearly everything we know about the research Chinese/American scientists were doing/planning on SARS-like viruses has been unearthed by independent journalists/investigators and NOT divulged by the researchers involved nor legacy
#media
.
Green does not really cite science or describe studies in detail, but instead quotes scientists who agree with the clear bias she went into the story with.
@NewYorker
is renowned for in-depth reporting but there is none of that here, indeed there is nothing that…
9/ Finally: Be especially wary of the "you should talk to a virologist" and "I'm a virologist and you're not" school of gaslighting and gatekeeping in scientific communication. That is not science, it's propaganda, and we don't need it. Let the truth be found, freely.
The failure of “mainstream”
#media
to cover this email trail (have there been any articles about them, trying to remember) is not a media “fail” but a deliberate decision to deprive readers of almost all the context for the pandemic’ origins.
@emilyakopp
Everything is coming out in drips.
First the EcoHealth report (2 years late) is filed in 2021, showing experiments with humanized mice.
The "Wild West" emails were redacted until recently
And only yesterday, we find out that the State department and (Fauci?) knew the whole time
A bunch of scientists propose putting an infection-enhancing genetic segment into a SARS-like virus and two years later a virus with that segment causes a pandemic. It's the kind of lead some journalists live for, but alas, not our science journalists.
The accusations of
#racism
coming from Rasmussen in particular are particularly ironic and hypocritical given her public treatment of
@Ayjchan
of the Broad Institute, who deserves huge credit for helping keep an honest debate about Covid origins alive. Here is what...
It’s a good day to read up on the atrocities committed by the
#Pinochet
regime that
#Kissinger
and other members of the Nixon administration helped to install, and then review the guest list for Kissinger’s recent 100th birthday party. .
#Chile
#Allende
I’m still waiting to see a major
#media
outlet explain to us in a major piece or series why all the tens of millions spent on programs to predict the next pandemic (USAID’s PREDICT, EcoHealth Alliance’s programs, etc.) failed to predict the next pandemic. Of course…
The INSTANT it was revealed that Daszak, the Wuhan lab, and Ralph Baric INTENDED to genetically engineer SARS-like viruses to be more infective in humans, every major news operation in the country should have assigned an investigative team to look into it. Instead, gaslighting.
I wrote a thread yesterday about the journalistic malpractice with which so many science reporters and nearly all of the mainstream
#media
have treated the Covid-19 origins story. One of the best examples was the reaction after DRASTIC leaked the 2018 proposal to DARPA…
I am preparing a post about the flaws in mainstream media coverage of the Covid origins debate. My overall observation is that mainstream reporters tend to slobber all over any paper, observation, or report that supports the natural origins hypothesis, while going on the…
I hate to say it but Jim Jordan was asking the right questions today about the Proximal Origins authors changing their minds about Covid origins over the course of about three days. The FOIA docs show clearly that science had little or nothing to do with it.
#COVID19
@Nature
and its reporter
@amymaxmen
decline to correct a glaring error in a story that mentions findings of a study led by the former head of China’s CDC, concerning the Huanan market in Wuhan. Here are the details.
@DavidBahry
Talk about conspiracies, here is one by Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance to hide Chinese viral sequences from outside scrutiny because they might put some people in a "bad light." What kind of bad light? What would the sequences show? h/t
@Ayjchan
via
@USRightToKnow
@nytimes
basically calling anyone who thought a lab-leak was possible a racist (see attached screenshot, a Tweet by
@apoorva_nyc
that she soon deleted; she has never written about Covid origins for the Times since.
I’ve known Fauci since the mid 1990s and I cannot believe that he would lie so brazenly. He has now gone beyond the lies he told before and entered an entirely new area of dishonesty.
Fauci: “The bat viruses that were studied have never been shown to infect humans, so by definition, for goodness’ sakes, it doesn’t fit into the definition of gain-of-function!” FFS, the research aimed to tweak bat viruses so that they could infect humans!
1/ A remarkable aspect of the current watershed events concerning suspension and likely debarment of EcoHealth Alliance from receiving U.S. funds is that the revelations which led up to it were uncovered almost entirely by independent journalists and investigators…
China pushing conspiracy theory that COVID-19 came from a US military base [This is why WHO can't get cooperation from China on Covid origins--the official line is that China had nothing to do with it]
in my view at least has provided some of the most balanced, cautious, and scientifically based analysis of the issues in the Covid origins debate, refraining from coming down on either side even as she is fully transparent about which way she leans. Who is the racist here?
This is from 2004 and it shows clearly how thoroughly we have been gaslighted by those who insist that the lab leak hypothesis is some kind of outlandish “conspiracy theory.” H/t
@mdc_martinus
#COVID19
BREAKING: NEWLY PUBLISHED PAPER CONCLUDES COVID VIRUS EVOLVED MANY WEEKS BEFORE PREVIOUS ESTIMATES, MAKING NATURAL ORIGINS HYPOTHESIS LESS LIKELY AND SUPPORTING IDEA THAT WUHAN MARKET WAS SITE OF A "SUPER-SPREADER" EVENT, NOT ZOONOTIC TRANSMISSION.
compensated for her mediocrity by pursuing personal profit." In other words, Rasmussen, a white woman who claims to be a feminist, saw fit to launch a thoroughly dehumanizing attack against an (Asian) scientist of color who is highly trained scientifically and who...
The fact that
@NIH
felt the need to terminate the
@EcoHealthNYC
subgrant to
#WIV
due to substantial noncompliance (WIV refusing to produce records and documents, a condition of the subgrant that EcoHealth failed to enforce) is huge news, but who is reporting it?
Scientists need to realize that if they ridicule a hypothesis for Covid origins that is obviously plausible, and poo-poo the risk of lab accidents even though we know they happen fairly often, they can't be surprised if the public comes to distrust much of what they say.
So it now turns out that the raccoon dog group (Florence Debarre and colleagues) apparently violated the terms of use of the database from which it got the partial data used in its analysis of samples from the Huanan seafood market, and thus engaged in unethical conduct…
There was once a time when I would have thought this was an inflammatory and totally unfair statement. Over the past 3.5 years, I have realized there is a lot of truth to it. We see it happening in real time.
Letting virologists investigate the origin of covid is like letting the police investigate cases of police brutality.
They'll try anything to exonerate their own asses.
@JamesCTobias
2/ Also now clear why Kristen Andersen, Eddie Holmes, Robert Garry, et al are so defensive about the role they played and so quick to attack others. They knuckled under to pressures from Fauci/Colins/Farrar to come to a natural origins conclusion for political reasons.
@politico
@greenfield64
No one serious about sexual misconduct today would think about calling Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky consensual given the power differential/employer-employee relationship.
My hunch is that when the intel is declassified, and if there are not too many redactions, this is basically what it will say. The whistleblowers are giving us a preview and also trying to keep the intel agencies honest.
After a serious mixup by a scientist that spread the dangerous avian flu H5N1 around CDC labs, the agency almost shipped a virus sample (50+% lethality in humans) to a famous children’s hospital. Lab accidents are not “conspiracy theories.”
The Proximal Origin authors “really, really” wished they could refute a lab origin, indeed that is what they set out to do. But they couldn’t, as they admitted privately. Nevertheless, publicly, they pretended that they had. That’s fraud, and scientific misconduct.
#COVID19
A pejorative characterization, is a dead giveaway of this) and even stoops to straight-out red-baiting at one point (“a key component of Marxist economic theory,” as if Green has proven with her reporting that Marxist analysis can be discounted.) Like so many reporters…
1/ Last summer, when NIH cancelled the subcontract (via EcoHealth Alliance) it had awarded to the Wuhan Inst Virology for work on SARS-like viruses due to failure to report its results,
@sciencemagazine
/
@sciencecohen
/
@JohnTravis
failed to cover it. When called out on it…
If any researcher at any U.S. lab knew for a fact that researchers at the Wuhan Inst Virology had inserted furin cleavage sites into SARS-like backbones, as has been reported (and repeated here), they had a solemn obligation to make that public.