Just to be clear, this is NOT the number of submissions we receive by month. This is the number of people we've had to ban by month. Prior to late 2022, that was mostly plagiarism. Now it's machine-generated submissions.
Debated posting it here, but...
This is a problem for short fiction submissions and it's not just going to go away. The link goes into details, but this is a graph of submission bans since 2019. Plagiarism and bot-written spam.
In an absolutely devastating announcement (right before the holidays) Amazon has informed us that they are ending their Kindle Subscription program in 2023 and trying to get magazines to switch to Kindle Unlimited. Asking for more details, but this is bad.
There have been multiple accusations that the cover art used for our recent issue is AI generated. We have removed and replaced the art while we investigate. The artist did sign a contract that included a statement that the work was not generated or assisted.
5. The people causing the problem are from outside the SF/F community. Largely driven in by "side hustle" experts making claims of easy money with ChatGPT. They are driving this and deserve some of the disdain shown to the AI developers.
It seems that some people are offended by publications saying they don't want "AI" art or fiction, no matter the reasons behind it. Publishers routinely say they don't want things. In addition to "AI", we don't want photos or horror. Those other groups never complain.
Five days ago, the chart we shared showed nearly 350 of these submissions. Today, it crossed 500. 50 of them just today, before we closed submissions so we can focus on the legit stories. 10% in less than half a day.
6. Our guidelines already state that we don't want "AI" written or assisted works. They don't care. A checkbox on a form won't stop them. They just lie.
7. If you want to support the magazine, the best thing to do is subscribe. Anything we do to fight this will cost us in time or money to acquire tools and with us losing Amazon as a subscription retailer later this year, the timing couldn't be worse.
2. We don't have a solution for the problem. We have some ideas for minimizing it, but the problem isn't going away. Detectors are unreliable. Pay-to-submit sacrifices too many legit authors. Print submissions are not viable for us.
1. We aren't closing the magazine. Closing submissions means that we aren't considering stories from authors at this time. We will reopen, but have not set a date.
If we determine the work was generated, it will be replaced with something more permanent. We stand firmly by our no AI policy and apologize for any distress this situation has caused our community.
After hearing back from the artist, we have decided to go our separate ways. The cover will be replaced with a new piece as soon as possible. (This is not a confirmation or denial. Just the end result.)
4. We could easily implement a system that only allowed authors that had previously submitted work to us. That would effectively ban new authors, which is not acceptable. They are an essential part of this ecosystem and our future.
One year ago today, we had to close submissions due to "AI" spam. We've long since reopened, but it continues to be a problem for us. Even with the countermeasures we've developed, it is still eating up a significant amount of my time.
I was definitely on the right track when I first referred to these machine-written submissions as spammy. The whole submission IS spam, not just the attached document. As much as some people would like this to be about quality, it isn't. It's just spam.
I just sent out twelve acceptance letters. Six authors are new to the magazine and two of those are first sales. This is one of my favorite parts of the job.
3. Various third-party tools for identity confirmation are more expensive than magazines can afford and tend to have regional holes. Adopting them would be the same as banning entire countries.
I can say that there are a couple of websites that I have contacted about removing our submissions link from pages on their site. Everyone that has come to us from those sites in the last couple of days is part of this problem.
We're currently experiencing another sharp uptick generated submission spam courtesy of a few "make money online" videos that are specifically targeting us. Laughable, I know, but the people viewing those videos often don't understand that. Nearly 300 in the last week.
By the way, we are currently open for submissions. All the publicity was around us having to close, so some people didn't get the word when we reopened last year. If you are hesitating because you don't want to overload us, STOP. Don't let the spammers win.
Apparently 55 is "too old to be editing one of the leading science fiction magazines" and I should "get out of the way" so someone younger can do it.
How's your day going?
"I want to make a strong protest to you. That is, I hope you die ten years earlier."
"it seems like you're bound to go to hell after you die. Haha."
"Why haven't you been sent bombs and killed?"
Samples from multiple emails titled "kill yourslef."
The reason: our no "AI" policy
Spoke to Isabel Fall this morning. Since people have asked, she suggests that those interested in materially supporting her donate money to Trans Lifeline. They've been a valued resource for her.
If you've tagged us in the last few days and hoped for a response, apologies. I probably haven't seen it. The attention around closing our submissions has been... unexpected and intense. A lot of media attention as well.
"AI" companies think that we should have to opt-out of data-scraping bots that take our work to train their products. There isn't even a required no-scraping period between the announcement and when they start. Too late? Tough.
Not acceptable.
#RequireOptIn
And if today's situation wasn't enough "AI" for you, there's currently a surge in submission spam. Looks like over 50 today and almost exclusively from one country. Ban hammer might break.
They just submit their work were a publisher is looking for that.
Oh... And they never try to pretend they are something else either. Something I've never heard:
"No, it's not a photo, it's a watercolor. Really."
"AI" developers are not entitled to take what they want and it is not our responsibility to provide them with what they "need." What they want for free, we actually pay artists, authors, translators, narrators, etc. for. They should do the same.
I've scheduled an appointment to talk with Amazon later this afternoon. Have many questions. Fellow editors of mags on Amazon: feel free to DM/email me. We should be talking.
Magazine subscriptions are currently guaranteed revenue from each subscriber. KU is not like that. It's not like the subscriptions can be converted either (unless your subscriber is already in KU), so it will effectively cancel thousands of subscriptions.
I've been helping some friends and colleagues block some of the site scraping bots that are feeding "AI" models. Decided to take some of my notes and make something others could use too. It's a work-in-progress. Happy to add to or correct things.
I haven't been speaking much about "AI" lately. It's not like the problem has gone away. We're still being hit and have had to adapt to new tactics a couple a few times. I just didn't have the energy to talk about it anymore and needed a break from the public stuff.
Our pay rate for fiction is now 12 cents/word. I made the change to the guidelines, forgot to announce it, and then it became a game to see how long it would take for anyone to say something. It finally happened today. :)
The Locus Award for Best Editor has been around since 1989. Prior to last night, only three people have ever won: Gardner Dozois (17), Ellen Datlow (17), and David G. Hartwell (1). Honored to be among them and still very stunned.
If there is anyone who would like to apologize to Isabel for their role in these events, please email me. That's the best way to make sure she receives it. My email address is on our website.
It's hard to even say how much we'd get from a single subscriber. This completely removes our ability to control our price if we want to be in the dominant ebook ecosystem.
It's after 2AM here in Scotland, but I wanted to say thank you to everyone that voted for me in the Hugo Awards. Honored to be this year's Editor Short Form winner. Going to go collapse somewhere now. (I've slept very little this week and it is catching up with me.)
@RayDaleyWriter
That model would shut out many legitimate authors that we have never received submissions from before and it would only get worse with time. They are an essentially part of the community and it would be a significant mistake to leave them behind. This is why we don't solicit.
Back from a short vacation. Spent some time swatting at "AI" spam from the beach. Yeah, another spike. Bans are back up to February levels.
This says about all I need to:
Chart is bans. Not total submissions.
We're still rebuilding subscriptions (since Amazon abandoned them) and pushing back against the generated submissions on a daily basis. We'd like to keep doing so. The path forward requires us to keep shouting from the rooftops, so...
Thank you!
Just sent out a batch of acceptance letters and contracts. Among them are a high school student and a few first sales. This is one of the joys of my job.
Someone tried to submit "The Nine Billion Names of God" by Arthur C. Clarke to Clarkesworld. All they changed was the author's name and one word in the title.
#plagiarism
Sent out thirteen acceptance letters today and have six more maybes to settle tonight. Of the thirteen, we have nine authors we've never worked with before, eight different countries represented, at least one first sale, and one translation.
@maxashermiller
In addition to being professional suicide (it's VERY frowned on in SF/F), even a small amount creates a barrier for some legitimate authors. We don't want to leave them behind.
I feel like I've been continually behind this year between "AI" and Amazon breaking subscriptions. Today, it was overdue acceptance day. Twenty-two of them. Nine to authors we've never worked with before.
This is definitely a new record for us. Three cases of plagiarism in slush this morning. Normally, one in a month is a lot. One of the three was a fairly recent Hugo Award finalist by an author I've worked with. Another was a slightly revised section of a Harry Potter book.
It is my pleasure to announce that Clarkesworld Magazine has received a grant from LTI Korea to publish nine Korean science fiction translations in their 2019 schedule.
Thanks to valiant efforts from our team, we have managed to process all submissions made prior to May 9th. This includes the best part of the job, emailing over 20 acceptances.
My Locus Award for Best Editor has arrived. Not an easy thing to take a picture of. Thank you to everyone that voted for me. This means a lot, particularly after everything that happened last year ("AI" and Amazon).
Amazon notified subscribers today that they are ending all print and digital subscriptions in September. This is what I was talking about in December. Our current editorial addresses how we're moving forward.
I have to say that the Spanish language submissions have been a bright spot among all the noise of the last couple of months. Between the "AI" nonsense in the English submissions and the discontinuation of Amazon's subscriptions, it's been rough.
My opinion hasn't softened. We continue have no interest in working with authors or artists that embrace "AI" tools. We have no respect for companies like OpenAI that steal from artists and authors. We want opt-in requirements for "AI" training.
Need to add that one of the strengths of being 55 is knowing not to take things like this to heart, but it's also not the first time I've heard people go after (primarily short fiction) editors in this manner. It's annoying and disrespectful.
Further information: It sounds like only some magazines are being invited to the KU program after the periodical program ends. Other editors I've spoken with did not receive the same email I did.
I've been monitoring the rebuilding subscriptions post-Amazon for the magazines that have been impacted. Unsurprisingly, it turns out that survival depends on us being more shameless. So... If you like what we do, maybe it's time to subscribe:
Just putting this out there. If someone decides to create a digital subscription service to fill the void left by Amazon's departure from that space, please reach out to us. Would be happy to support someone providing a reasonable alternative.
Happy to report our first acceptance from the Spanish language submissions window that opened on the 15th.
"La máquina de café" by Celia Corral-Vázquez will be translated and published in Clarkesworld later this year.
There's a myth that most of the people who subscribe to science fiction magazines are writers. It has been frequently refuted, but some people won't let it go. Here's a look at our data:
Why do I feel like I'm watching some Saturday morning cartoon villain every time they open their mouths? And where the heck is the hero that is supposed to swoop in and POW! Z-ZWAP! THWACK! them?
Our June 2023 issue is now online at:
and features original fiction by Dominica Phetteplace, Carrie Vaughn, Isabel J. Kim, Angela Liu, David Ebenbach, Jana Bianchi, Bella Han, and Rajeev Prasad. Cover art by Pascal Blanché.
Ok, call completed. Happy to report that I did not shoot the messenger. Received a lot of useful information that will take some time to digest. Also expecting their terms and contract details along with a quote late next week.
We are now blocking another one of OpenAI's scraping bots. You can too. (I don't know if this is the secret one we couldn't block before or if that one is still in use.)
Finally testing COVID-free. Fatigue still hits at unpredictable times, but I've been lucky not to be hit by the respiratory issues, particular with my medical history. Mountain of work to catch up on, but will be pacing myself.
Currently on my way to Norwescon. Spending a chunk of the flight reading slush and banning people who are still trying to send us "AI" spam as their own work.
Lately I've been concerned that one of the legacies of online magazines (like mine) will be the devaluation of short fiction. It may be available for free, but it doesn't mean it isn't without cost or value. Authors, editors, and staff of these publications deserve to be paid.
We're 344 subscribers away from where we were before Amazon pulled the rug out from under their traditional subscription program. There is light at the end of the tunnel, but still much work to do.
I didn't plan on making these daily updates, but we crossed into the 200s over the holiday and that seems like a reason to celebrate. Only 286 subscriptions remain before we've erased all the losses caused by Amazon!
As a result, I've dialed up some the security flagging in our submission system to help with identification. If you are using a proxy or VPN, you may end up with a slower response time as the system will be more inclined to mark it as suspicious. That just changes its priority.
I was told it was ok to share, so I will. KU for Magazines is different than KU for books. It will not prevent us from publishing/selling our magazine elsewhere. It is not paid per-paid, but based on an annual projection based on "qualified borrows."